© 2024 Lifeback Law Firm, P.A. | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Bankruptcy Attorney Marketing Powered by Gorilla.
(a) DURING INITIAL CONSIDERATION OF A CASE ON THE MERITS.
(1) Applicability. This Rule 8017(a) governs amicus filings during a court’s initial consideration of a case on the merits.
(2) When Permitted. The United States or its officer or agency or a state may file an amicus brief without the consent of the parties or leave of court. Any other amicus curiae may file a brief only by leave of court or if the brief states that all parties have consented to its filing, but a district court or BAP may prohibit the filing of or may strike an amicus brief that would result in a judge’s disqualification. On its own motion, and with notice to all parties to an appeal, the district court or BAP may request a brief by an amicus curiae.
(3) Motion for Leave to File. The motion must be accompanied by the proposed brief and state:
(A) the movant’s interest; and
(B) the reason why an amicus brief is desirable and why the matters asserted are relevant to the disposition of the appeal.
(4) Contents and Form. An amicus brief must comply with Rule 8015. In addition to the requirements of Rule 8015, the cover must identify the party or parties supported and indicate whether the brief supports affirmance or reversal. If an amicus curiae is a corporation, the brief must include a disclosure statement like that required of parties by Rule 8012. An amicus brief need not comply with Rule 8014, but must include the following:
(A) a table of contents, with page references;
(B) a table of authorities—cases (alphabetically arranged), statutes, and other authorities—with references to the pages of the brief where they are cited;
(C) a concise statement of the identity of the amicus curiae, its interest in the case, and the source of its authority to file;
(D) unless the amicus curiae is one listed in the first sentence of subdivision (a)(2), a statement that indicates whether:
(i) a party’s counsel authored the brief in whole or in part;
(ii) a party or a party’s counsel contributed money that was intended to fund preparing or submitting the brief; and
(iii) a person—other than the amicus curiae, its members, or its counsel—contributed money that was intended to fund preparing or submitting the brief and, if so, identifies each such person;
(E) an argument, which may be preceded by a summary and need not include a statement of the applicable standard of review; and
(F) a certificate of compliance, if required by Rule 8015(h).
(5) Length. Except by the district court’s or BAP’s permission, an amicus brief must be no more than one-half the maximum length authorized by these rules for a party’s principal brief. If the court grants a party permission to file a longer brief, that extension does not affect the length of an amicus brief.
(6) Time for Filing. An amicus curiae must file its brief, accompanied by a motion for filing when necessary, no later than 7 days after the principal brief of the party being supported is filed. An amicus curiae that does not support either party must file its brief no later than 7 days after the appellant’s principal brief is filed. The district court or BAP may grant leave for later filing, specifying the time within which an opposing party may answer.
(7) Reply Brief. Except by the district court’s or BAP’s permission, an amicus curiae may not file a reply brief.
(8) Oral Argument. An amicus curiae may participate in oral argument only with the district court’s or BAP’s permission.
(b) DURING CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER TO GRANT REHEARING.
(1) Applicability. This Rule 8017(b) governs amicus filings during a district court’s or BAP’s consideration of whether to grant rehearing, unless a local rule or order in a case provides otherwise.
(2) When Permitted. The United States or its officer or agency or a state may file an amicus brief without the consent of the parties or leave of court. Any other amicus curiae may file a brief only by leave of court.
(3) Motion for Leave to File. Rule 8017(a)(3) applies to motion for leave.
(4) Contents, Forms, and Length. Rule 8017(a)(4) applies to the amicus brief. The brief must include a certificate under Rule 8015(h) and not exceed 2,600 words.
(5) Time for Filing. An amicus curiae supporting the motion for rehearing or supporting neither party must file its brief, accompanied by a motion for filing when necessary, no later than 7 days after the motion is filed. An amicus curiae opposing the motion for rehearing must file its brief, accompanied by a motion for filing when necessary, no later than the date set by the court for the response.
© 2024 Lifeback Law Firm, P.A. | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
“Very nice people, they really help alot and make your visit very comfortable.. thanks ”
- Sue L.
“I went to google to check out some attorney's in the Mpls area and the first office that came up was Kain & Scott. I checked out their website and I was sold on them right away! I was very impressed with what I read about them and the people who worked for them.”
“If you, or somebody you know, is considering filing for bankruptcy, do yourself a favor, don't bother contacting just any law firm. Contact Kain & Scott! They will make you feel more relaxed and less stressed than you've felt in a LONG time! THEY HAVE YOUR BEST INTEREST because THEY CARE ABOUT YOU. Call them or email them. You will NOT be sorry.”
- Justin T.
“Kain & Scott PA is the nicest law firm they don’t judge and have amazing people to answer the phones and be patient with clients like us Megan Rockenbach is such a good listener and very kind on the phone.”
- Ceairra B.
“Everyone in the office is extremely helpful and nice!”
- Miranda M.
“These are very kind and helpful people who take the stigma out of bankruptcy and treated me like I wanted to be treated. They understand good people sometimes have hard times. Wes Scott and his team are so nice! Stephanie Buerger has been a savior and responds to my email or phone call questions the same day. It feels like small town service with big city talent and reputation!”
- John S.
“They live up to their motto of being the friendliest lawyers around. The welcome receptionist comes around to greet you and leads you to a private room furnished with snacks and drinks. There is a massage chair in the room and your name is on a sign welcoming you personally to the private space.”
- Brother S.
“There are no better bankruptcy attorneys in MN - from the initial conversation to working with Veronica on payments, there are no finer people to help you get your life on track. Bankruptcy can be a terrifying thing, but Kain and Scott absolutely have your back.”
- Andrew K.
“After doing a bunch of internet research for Bankruptcy Attorneys, Kain & Scott PA overshadowed all others I had looked at. If you are not sure what to do, which option is best or who to choose, please call Kain & Scott. They will listen to your situation and tell you what your best option would be. Again call Kain & Scott, you will be glad you did! I know I am!!”
- Tammy E.
“I am not one to ever right a review, but with how wonderful Kain & Scott are I just have to let other people know. I would most definitely recommend them to my family, friends, or a colleague who is looking at filing bankruptcy.”
- Jessica A.
“Kain and Scott is the BEST!! Margaret H. helped me out a great deal when I was going through my hardship! I really love the fact that all the staff including Lindsay B. was kind enough to answer some personal questions that I had along the way. I wouldn't choose another company to work with! Thank you everyone who made my journey as a BREEZE! Now I would like to include Stephanie V. Buerger for congratulating me on my journey stepping forward to a debt free life! Stephanie Googins has done a great job providing me with additional information after the bankruptcy proc”ess!
- Gina S.
“I highly recommend this firm as well as recommending bankruptcy! Times have changed and it's not a big deal like it may have once been or how old people talk about it. It's truly a new beginning. This has made my life so much simpler. Exactly what I needed heading into a divorce. I can't thank these guys enough!! ”
- Mandy B.
“The process was so easy, this firm does all of the work for you and really works for you. They are great in responding to any questions you may have. I would recommend this firm to anyone who is struggling with debt. They are also very cost effective, and will work with you for payment arrangements. We couldn't be more satisfied! Debt free finally!”
- Katie B.
“All I can say is wow! From the moment I walked in the door I felt welcome and better right away! Everyone one treated me like me like my story actually mattered! I worked with Misty Myers and she was such an amazing person to work with! She made things so easy and just took charge right away with trying to help! I highly recommend Kain and Scott! I couldn't be happier with how I was treated!”
- Dustin S
“Even from the first conversation I had on the phone regarding their services, I knew I was going to choose them. I made an appointment for the following week and was welcomed with no judgement. The whole process was fast and efficient. I worked personally with Misty, Samantha, and Callie but everyone there was extremely helpful when I had questions. There was little to no paperwork and they did most of the work for me. My only regret was not filing sooner!”
- Megan W.
“The staff at Kain & Scott were amazing! They make you feel very comfortable from the first time you step in the door. Everything is well organized and they respond quickly to any questions you have. Shout out to Wes, Calli, Megan, Sarah, and Lindsey you all were great in helping me get my life back. Keep up the good work!!”
- Toby A.
“I have to say I have had the greatest experience filing bankruptcy with Kain&Scott. Kelsey B Quarburg and Jesse A Horoshak were two of the most professional attorneys I have ever worked with. Jesse showed up at my 341 meeting totally prepared. Other attorneys along with their clients weren't. Jesse and I weren’t called up first, so I had the privilege of seeing how this meeting would work. The first two clients and attorneys weren’t prepared at all, they were told by the federal trustees,that they were missing paperwork and information. It took these two clients and attorneys 20 minutes each to get through the process. Jesse had 1 client he was representing before me. The process was flawless, 5 minutes and the process was complete. My meeting took 5 minutes. It proved to me choosing the best law firm matters. Kelsey B Quarburg is the best. She was very professional yet she was also human. She would respond to my emails at odd times of the day and night. She kept me informed every step of the way. Thank you both. Thank you Callie for making sure my paperwork was forwarded and up to date. What a team. Thank you all so much for a job well done ,and I mean this from the bottom of my heart. Once again thank you all,for giving my life back. GOD BLESS YOU ALL ”
- Maurice W.
“Stellar customer service and you have the “how can I help you” staff! You made my future easier to handle and I have so much more confidence especially with your staff behind me. I appreciate all your help and time you spend helping me address my credit. ”
- Nancy N.
“I am very fortunate to have found Kain & Scott. They made my experience fast, friendly and trustworthy. Thank you to Megan R. for being flexible with payment arrangements and really understanding what other people may be going through and how to do what is best for them. 😊 Thank you to Stephanie Buerger as well,for being very welcoming and easy to work with during my initial info gathering. Thank you gals for making my experience a low stress to the point “filer friendly” experience. ”
- Scott K.